'utterly untranslatable'
'It's Poland and the rich Jews again.'
'There is no commercial advantage in acquiring her, and, in my opinion, no artistic.'
'His frenetic and scrambled prose perfectly express the feverish travels of the Beat Generation. But is that enough? I don't think so.'
'for your own sake do not publish this book.'
'an irresponsible holiday story'
'an absurd and uninteresting fantasy which was rubbish and dull.'
'older children wouldn't like it because its language was too difficult.'
'There certainly isn't enough genuine talent for us to take notice.'
‘The author of this book is beyond psychiatric help.'
'This will set publishing back 25 years.'
'Do you realize, young woman, that you're the first American writer ever to poke fun at sex.'
‘The girl doesn’t, it seems to me, have a special perception or feeling which would lift that book above the “curiosity” level.’
(which was rejected 16 times, but found a publisher and went on to sell about 25 million copies)
‘ A long, dull novel about an artist.’
'The grand defect of the work, I think, as a work of art is the low-mindedness and vulgarity of the chief actors. There is hardly a lady" or "gentleman" amongst them.'
'We are not interested in science fiction which deals with negative utopias. They do not sell.'
‘I haven’t really the foggiest idea about what the man is trying to say… Apparently the author intends it to be funny – possibly even satire – but it is really not funny on any intellectual level … From your long publishing experience you will know that it is less disastrous to turn down a work of genius than to turn down talented mediocrities.’
‘You’re welcome to le Carré – he hasn’t got any future.’
‘It is impossible to sell animal stories in the USA’
‘My dear sir,
I have read your manuscript. Oh, my dear sir.’
‘... overwhelmingly nauseating, even to an enlightened Freudian … the whole thing is an unsure cross between hideous reality and improbable fantasy. It often becomes a wild neurotic daydream … I recommend that it be buried under a stone for a thousand years.’
(The New York Times)
No comments:
Post a Comment